Several alternative methods may be helpful when used under medical supervision as an addition to standard treatment. They may help stabilize, reduce, or eliminate medication requirements; or correct nutritional deficiencies associated with diabetes. However, because diabetes is a dangerous disease with many potential complications, alternative treatment for diabetes should not be attempted as a substitute for conventional medical care.
Other natural treatments may be helpful for preventing and treating complications of diabetes, such as peripheral neuropathy, cardiac autonomic neuropathy, retinopathy, and cataracts. See the article on
Complications of Diabetes
for more information.
Treatments for Improving Blood Sugar Control
The following treatments might be able to improve blood sugar control in type 1 and/or type 2 diabetes. However, for none of these is the evidence strong. One point to keep in mind is that the mere fact of joining a study tends to improve blood sugar control in people with diabetes, even before any treatment is begun!
Presumably, the experience of being enrolled in a trial causes participants to watch their diet more closely. This serves to indicate, however, that for diabetes, as for all conditions, use of
method is essential. Only if the proposed treatment proves more effective than placebo can it be considered to work in its own right.
Another point to keep in mind is this: If any natural treatment for diabetes actually works, you will need to reduce your medications to avoid hypoglycemia. For this reason, medical supervision is essential.
Chromium is an essential trace mineral that plays a significant role in sugar metabolism. Some evidence suggests that chromium supplementation may help bring blood sugar levels under control in type 2 diabetes, but it is far from definitive.
A 4-month study reported in 1997 followed 180 Chinese men and women with type 2 diabetes, comparing the effects of 1,000 mcg chromium, 200 mcg chromium, and placebo.
The results showed that HbA1c values (a measure of long-term blood sugar control) improved significantly after 2 months in the group receiving 1,000 mcg, and in both chromium groups after 4 months. Fasting glucose (a measure of short-term blood sugar control) was also lower in the group taking the higher dose of chromium.
trial of 78 people with type 2 diabetes compared two forms of chromium (brewer's yeast and chromium chloride) against placebo.
This rather complex crossover study consisted of four 8-week intervals of treatment in random order. The results in the 67 participants who completed the study showed that both forms of chromium significantly improved blood sugar control. Positive results were also seen in other small double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of people with type 2 diabetes.
However, several other studies have failed to find chromium helpful for improving blood sugar control in type 2 diabetes.
These contradictory findings suggest that the benefit, if it really exists, is small.
A combination of chromium and biotin might be more effective. Following positive results in a small pilot trial,
researchers conducted a double-blind study of 447 people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.
Half the participants were given placebo and the rest were given a combination of 600 mg chromium (as chromium picolinate) along with 2 mg of
daily. All participants continued to receive standard oral medications for diabetes. Over the 90-day study period, participants given the chromium/biotin combination showed significantly better glucose regulation than those given placebo. The relative benefit was clear in levels of fasting glucose as well as in HgA1c.
One placebo-controlled study of 30 women with gestational diabetes (diabetes during pregnancy) found that supplementation with chromium (at a dosage of 4 or 8 mcg chromium picolinate for each kilogram of body weight)
improved blood sugar control.
Chromium has also shown a bit of promise for helping diabetes caused by
For more information, including dosage and safety issues, see the full
In double-blind studies performed by a single research group, use of American ginseng
appeared to improve blood sugar control.
In some but not all studies, the same researchers subsequently reported possible benefit with Korean red ginseng, a specially prepared form of
A different research group found benefits with ordinary
However, in other studies (conducted by the research group mentioned in the previous paragraph), ordinary
blood sugar control rather than improve it.
Yet another group found potential benefit.
It seems possible that certain ginsenosides (found in high concentrations in some American ginseng products) may lower blood sugar while others (found in high concentration in some
products) may raise it. It has been suggested that since the actions of these various ginseng constituents are not well defined at this time, ginseng should
be used to treat diabetes until more is known.
For more information, including dosage and safety issues, see the full
The succulent aloe plant has been valued since prehistoric times as a topical treatment for burns, wound infections, and other skin problems. However, recent evidence suggests that oral aloe might be useful for type 2 diabetes.
Evidence from two human trials suggests that aloe gel can improve blood sugar control.
, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the potential benefits of aloe in either 72 or 40 people with diabetes. (The study report appears to contradict itself).
The results showed significantly greater improvements in blood sugar levels among those given aloe over the 2-week treatment period.
Another single-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the benefits of aloe in people who had failed to respond to the oral diabetes drug glibenclamide.
Of the 36 people who completed the study, those taking glibenclamide and aloe showed definite improvements in blood sugar levels over 42 days as compared to those taking glibenclamide and placebo.
While these are promising results, large studies that are double- rather than single-blind will be needed to establish aloe as an effective treatment for improving blood sugar control.
Note that in the above we are referring to the gel of the aloe vera plant, and not the leaf skin (the latter is drug aloe, not aloe gel). However, some confusion has been introduced by the fact that some leaf skin may find its way into gel products, and that could be the actual active ingredient in aloe gel regarding diabetes.
It is possible, therefore, that completely pure aloe gel might not work!
For more information, including dosage and safety issues, see the full
Cinnamon has been widely advertised as an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes as well as high cholesterol. The primary basis for this claim is a single study performed in Pakistan.
In this 40-day study, 60 people with type 2 diabetes were given cinnamon at a dose of 1, 3, or 6 g daily. The results reportedly indicated that use of cinnamon improved blood sugar levels by 18% to 29%, total cholesterol by 12% to 26%, LDL (“bad”) cholesterol by 7% to 27%, and triglycerides by 23% to 30%. These results were said to be statistically significant as compared to the beginning of the study and to the placebo group.
However, this study has some odd features. The most important is that it found no significant difference in benefit between the various doses of cinnamon. This is called lack of a “dose-related effect,” and it generally casts doubt on the results of a study.
In an attempt to replicate these results, a group of Dutch researchers performed a carefully designed 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 25 people with type 2 diabetes.
All participants were given 1.5 g of cinnamon daily. The results failed to show any detectable effect on blood sugar, insulin sensitivity, or cholesterol profile.
Furthermore, a double-blind study performed in Thailand enrolling 60 people, again using 1.5 g of cinnamon daily, also failed to find benefit.
On the other hand, a double-blind trail of 79 people that used 3 g instead of 1.5 g daily did find that cinnamon improved blood sugar levels.
And, a randomized trial involving 58 people with type 2 diabetes also concluded that 2 g of cinnamon daily reduced HbA1c levels (a measurement of blood sugar levels over time), as well as
high blood pressure
In addition, a very small study evaluated cinnamon for improving blood sugar control in women with polycystic ovary disease, and it too found evidence of benefit.
Regarding type 1 diabetes, a study of 72 adolescents failed to find benefit with cinnamon taken at a dose of 1 g daily.
A meta-analysis (formal statistical review) of all published evidence concluded that, thus far, cinnamon has not yet been shown to have any effect on blood sugar levels in people with diabetes.
Systematic reviews and meta analysis can sometimes clarify the existence of benefits, but two systematic reviews published in 2012 and 2013 only provided conflicting results. The first review included a meta-analysis of 10 randomized trials with 577 patients who were given an average dose of 2 g of cinnamon per day for 4-16 weeks. The use of cinnamon was not associated with differences in blood glucose, HbA1c, or insulin levels when compared to placebo or usual care. However, most trials in this review had a moderate or high risk of bias, which affect the reliability of the results.
The second review included 10 randomized trials with 543 patients who were given doses of cinnamon ranging from 0.12 g to 6 g. Those taking cinnamon showed significant decreases in blood glucose, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels when compared to placebo or no treatment. Although, there was no difference in HbA1c levels between the groups. Unfortunately, there was a wide variation in dosing and length of treatments in the included trials which makes it impossible to determine an ideal dosage for treatment.
The bottom line: The evidence regarding cinnamon as a treatment for diabetes is highly inconsistent, suggesting that if cinnamon is indeed effective, the dosage is very unclear and its benefits may be minimal at most.
For more information, see the full
Other Treatments Studied For Their Effect On Blood Sugar Control
The food spice
might also help control blood sugar, but the supporting evidence is weak. In a 2-month, double-blind study of 25 people with type 2 diabetes, use of fenugreek (1 g daily of a standardized extract) significantly improved some measures of blood sugar control and insulin response as compared to placebo.
Triglyceride levels decreased and HDL (“good”) cholesterol levels increased, presumably due to the enhanced insulin sensitivity. Similar benefits have been seen in animal studies and open human trials as well.
However, it is possible that the effects of fenugreek are simply due to its dietary fiber content.
, the ancient healing system of India, has been studied for its potential effect on blood sugar control.
The Ayurvedic herb gymnema may be helpful for minor cases of type 2 diabetes when used alone or with standard care (under a doctor's supervision in either case). Combination herbal therapies used in Ayurvedic medicine have also shown some promise for improving blood sugar control.
A 2011 review included trials on a variety of herbal mixtures, including Diabecon, Cogent DB, Inolter, Hyponidd, and Pancreas Tonic.
Compared to placebo or usual care, the mixtures of Diabecon, Cogent DB, and Inolter significantly reduced HbA1c levels (an indicator of overall blood sugar control) and fasting blood sugar levels. Another study attempted to test the effectiveness of whole-person Ayurvedic treatment, involving exercise, diet, meditation, and herbal treatment.
However, minimal benefits were seen.
Studies in rats with and without diabetes suggest that high doses of the mineral
may have an insulin-like effect, reducing blood sugar levels.
Based on these findings, preliminary studies involving human subjects have been conducted, with some promising results.
However, of 151 studies recently reviewed, none were of sufficient quality to judge whether or not vanadium is at all beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
The researchers did find that vanadium was often associated with gastrointestinal side effects. Furthermore, there may be some cause for concern given the high doses of vanadium used in some of these studies.
The following herbs are proposed for helping to control blood sugar, but the supporting evidence regarding their potential benefit is, in all cases, at best highly preliminary. For some, there are as many negative results as positive.
Additionally, the supplements
might also help control blood sugar levels, at least slightly.
One placebo-controlled study found hints that use of
medium chain triglycerides (MCTs)
by people with type 2
might improve insulin sensitivity and aid weight loss.
) is widely advertised as effective for diabetes, but the scientific basis for this claim is limited to animal studies, uncontrolled human trials, and other unreliable forms of evidence.
The one properly designed (eg, double-blind, placebo-controlled) study of bitter melon failed to find benefit.
Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA)
has shown promise in preliminary trials.
However, other studies have found that CLA might worsen blood sugar control. ( See
Supplements to Use Only with Caution
for more information.)
One study found that insulin metabolism in 278 young, overweight subjects improved on a calorie-restricted diet rich in fish oil from seafood or supplements compared to those on a diet low in fish oil. Though highly preliminary, the results suggest that
may help delay the onset of diabetes in susceptible individuals.
In another study of 50 people with type 2 diabetes, 2 g per day of purified omega-3-fatty acids (fish oil) was able to significantly lower triglycerides levels.
However, it had no effect on blood sugar control.
Other herbs traditionally used for diabetes that might possibly offer some benefit include
Musa sapientum L.
A double-blind study of more than 200 people evaluated the effectiveness of a combination herbal formula used in
traditional Chinese herbal medicine
This study evaluated Coptis Formula with and without the drug glibenclamide. The results hint that Coptis Formula may enhance the effectiveness of the drug, but that it is not powerful enough to treat diabetes on its own.
Another randomized trial, this one lacking a control group, found no added benefit for Tai Chi in the treatment of blood glucose and cholesterol levels among 53 people with
type 2 diabetes
over a period of 6 months.
One study claimed to find evidence that
supplements can reduce levels of blood sugar.
However, because dextrose (a form of sugar) was used as the “placebo” in this trial, the results are somewhat questionable.
In one study, the herb
did not work, and showed the potential to cause liver injury.
One study found hints that the supplement
might improve insulin sensitivity.
However, a subsequent more rigorous study failed to find benefits.
Relatively weak evidence hints that
) might help control blood sugar.
It has been suggested that if your child has just developed diabetes, the supplement niacinamide—a form of niacin, also called
—might slightly prolong what is called the honeymoon period.
This is the interval during which the pancreas can still make some insulin, and the body’s need for insulin injections is low. However, the benefits (if any) appear to be minor. A cocktail of niacinamide plus
vitamins and minerals has also been tried, but the results were disappointing.
(Niacinamide has also been tried for preventing diabetes in high risk children. See
According to most studies,
(FOS, also known as "prebiotics") do
improve blood sugar control in people with type 2
As part of a systematic review on pine bark extract (
oligomeric proanthocyanidins [OPCs]
), 2 studies (involving a total of 125 people) found evidence to support its use in people with type 2 diabetes, where it may help to modestly reduce blood glucose levels and protein in the urine (a sign of kidney damage).
In a randomized trial of 86 people with ,
sage leaf extract
improved fasting glucose and HbA1c when compared to placebo.
has been studied for its potential effect on HbA1c levels in people with type 2 diabetes. Two, small randomized, placebo-controlled trials (with a total of 89 people) found that milk thistle helped to improve both HbA1c and fasting blood sugar levels in diabetics.
These results, though, should be considered highly preliminary.
has shown some promise for enhancing blood sugar control in children with diabetes.
A review of 9 clinical trials found insufficient evidence to support the Traditional Chinese practice of
as beneficial for treatment of type 2 diabetes.