To find a doctor, call 800-667-5356 or click below:

Find a Doctor

Request an Appointment

left banner
right banner
Smaller Larger

Axillary Node Dissection Unnecessary?

Posted 2/9/2011

Posted in

An important study has just been published in JAMA. Researchers at the John Wayne Cancer Institute in California compared survival rates between women with early stage breast cancer who had "only" sentinal node dissection vs those who had a full axillary node dissection. There were no differences. Since the risks of the larger surgery are not insignificant, this may have major implications for surgical care.

Here the report from the American Cancer Society:

SUBJECT: Study Says Lymph Node Surgery Does Not Improve Outcome in Early Stage Breast Cancer
======================================================
A new study finds women with early breast cancer may not need to have surgery to remove cancerous lymph nodes under the armpit. The study led by researchers at the John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif. appears in the current Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). For the study, researchers analyzed outcomes among a group of women who received either axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND). All women had early-stage breast cancer that had spread to a nearby lymph node and had received treatment that included lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Overall survival rates after five years were about the same in both groups. The researchers say their results suggest that breast cancer patients, such as those in this study, do not benefit from the addition of ALND in terms of local control, disease-free survival, or overall survival, and that ALND may no longer be justified for certain patients. Below is a comment from Otis W. Brawley, M.D., American Cancer Society national chief medical officer:

"Important in the history of cancer research has been the refinement of the surgical treatment of breast cancer. This study and others like it may ultimately change the standard for breast surgery among women with breast cancer who have sentinel nodes that test positive for the disease. It may also lead to breast cancer treatments that cause less harm.

"Currently, women with breast cancer who also test positive for cancer in the sentinel lymph node often receive further surgery to remove twelve to eighteen lymph nodes; so-called axillary dissection. This procedure often causes lymphedema, restricted shoulder movement, and other disabilities. Axillary dissection has been done for past several decades to determine staging and prognosis for treatment planning. It has not been used as a treatment per se. This study is evidence that the surgery may not be needed."


JAMA PRESS RELEASE:


Limited Lymph Node Removal for Certain Breast Cancer Patients Does Not Appear to Result in Poorer Survival
CHICAGO—Among patients with early-stage breast cancer that had spread to a nearby lymph node and who received treatment that included lumpectomy and radiation therapy, women who just had the sentinel lymph node removed (the first lymph node to which cancer is likely to spread from the primary tumor) did not have worse survival than women who had more extensive axillary lymph node dissection (surgery to remove lymph nodes found in the armpit), according to a study in the February 9 issue of JAMA .

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been part of breast cancer surgery since the use of radical mastectomy and reliably identifies nodal metastases. "Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) accurately identifies nodal metastasis of early breast cancer, but it is not clear whether further nodal dissection [removal] affects survival," the authors write. "ALND, as a means for achieving local disease control, carries an indisputable and often unacceptable risk of complications such as seroma [a mass or swelling caused by the localized accumulation of serum within a tissue or organ], infection, and lymphedema [condition in which excess fluid called lymph collects in tissues and causes swelling]."

Armando E. Giuliano, M.D., of the John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif., and colleagues conducted a study to determine the effects of ALND on overall survival in patients with SLN metastases treated with lumpectomy (surgical removal of a tumor without removing much of the surrounding tissue or lymph nodes) and radiation therapy. The trial was conducted at 115 sites and enrolled patients from May 1999 to December 2004. Patients were women with T1-T2 (stage of tumor) invasive breast cancer, no palpable adenopathy (enlarged lymph nodes), and 1 to 2 SLNs containing metastases.

Patients with SLN metastases identified by SLND were randomized to undergo ALND or no further axillary treatment. Those randomized to ALND underwent dissection of 10 or more nodes. Of 891 patients, 445 were randomly assigned to the ALND group and 446 to the SLND-alone group.

As expected, there was a difference between ALND and SLND-alone treatment groups in total number of removed lymph nodes and total number of tumor-involved nodes; the median (midpoint) total number of nodes removed was 17 in the ALND group and 2 in the SLND-alone group. At a median follow-up of 6.3 years, there were 94 deaths (SLND-alone group, 42; ALND group, 52). The use of SLND alone compared with ALND did not appear to result in statistically inferior survival, with the 5-year over all survival rates being 92.5 percent in the SLND-alone group and 91.8 percent in the ALND group. Disease-free survival did not differ significantly between treatment groups, with 5-year disease-free survival being 83.9 percent for the SLND-alone group and 82.2 percent for the ALND group.

The rate of wound infections, axillary seromas, and paresthesias (prickly, tingling sensations) among patients in the trial was higher for the ALND group than for the SLND-alone group (70 percent vs. 25 percent).

The authors note that these results suggest that breast cancer patients, such as those in this study, do not benefit from the addition of ALND in terms of local control, disease-free survival, or overall survival, and that ALND may no longer be justified for certain patients. "Implementation of this practice change would improve clinical outcomes in thousands of women each year by reducing the complications associated with ALND and improving quality of life with no diminution in survival."

Share:

Add your comment

 
 
 

Categories

Archive